Effectiveness of Collaborative, Workshop-Style Teaching Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7190/jostle.v1i1.613Keywords:
active learning, student engagement, motivation, attendance, performanceAbstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a collaborative, workshop style teaching model introduced within a postgraduate computing module, replacing traditional lecture-based delivery. Grounded in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), the research investigates whether this active learning (Ribeiro-Silva et al., 2022) approach enhances attendance motivation, student engagement, and perceived academic performance among postgraduate students who often balance academic study with professional commitments (Kahu, 2013; Fredricks et al., 2004). Using a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 36 postgraduate students through a structured questionnaire employing a five-point Likert scale. Three proxy constructs were examined: attendance motivation, engagement, and perceived academic performance. Reliability analysis demonstrated strong internal consistency for engagement (Cronbach’s α = 0.80) and acceptable reliability for attendance (α = 0.64). Descriptive statistics, confidence intervals, and Pearson correlation analysis were used to explore relationships between the constructs. The findings indicate consistently positive outcomes across all measures. Students reported increased motivation to attend in person sessions, high levels of active participation and collaboration, and strong perceptions of improved understanding and assessment readiness. Engagement showed a moderate to strong correlation with perceived academic performance (r ≈ 0.67), suggesting that students who felt more engaged also felt they learned more. Attendance motivation was similarly correlated with both engagement and performance, reinforcing the interconnected nature of these outcomes (Sukor et al., 2021). Qualitative feedback highlighted the value of interactive activities such as group problem solving, discussions, and peer feedback, while also identifying areas for improvement, including session pacing and equitable participation in group work. Overall, the findings demonstrate that collaborative, workshop style teaching enhances postgraduate engagement, and perceived learning and offers practical recommendations (Mendo-Lázaro et al., 2022).
References
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Sukor, R., Ayub, A. F. M., Rashid, N. K. M. A., & Halim, F. A. (2021). Relationship between students’ engagement and academic performance. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.95
Mendo-Lázaro, S., León-del-Barco, B., Polo-del-Río, M. I., & López-Ramos, V. M. (2022). The impact of cooperative learning on university students’ academic goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787210
Ribeiro-Silva, E., Amorim, C., Aparicio-Herguedas, J. L., & Batista, P. (2022). Trends of active learning in higher education and students’ well-being: A literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844236
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yasir Javed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons-Attribution (CC-BY) licence.This licence allows people to ‘copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format' and 'remix, transform, and build upon the materiafor any purpose, even commercially.'
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.