Transparent Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7190/jostle.v1i1.626Keywords:
artificial intelligence, GenAI, Transparency, assessmentAbstract
At Sheffield Hallam University, assessment briefs must inform students how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can or cannot be used, and students submitting assessments must be transparent about their use of GenAI. The University recommends the use of the Artificial Intelligence Transparency Statement (AITS) (Purvis, 2025) in assessment briefs to identify the extent to which students might use GenAI in assessments. In the School of Sport and Physical Activity, we chose not to adopt the AITS as it was difficult to interpret, operationalise and was not flexible enough to prohibit the use of GenAI in one section of an assignment and permit the use in another. In the School of Sport and Physical Activity, all assessment briefs include the DEFAULT position statement, which encourages the use of grammar and spell checkers. Plus, one or more statements associated with if the use of GenAI is: PROHIBITED, ELECTIVE, or INTEGRAL. Any one or more of these statements could apply to any part of the assessment. Where GenAI use is ELECTIVE, students are not obligated to use AI, and no additional credit/marks are awarded for its use. These statements are supported by clear descriptions (based on work from the Bristol Institute for Learning and Teaching, (2024)) of how GenAI could be used. On completion of the assessment, students are required to complete an AI Usage Declaration, which provides clear direction about the ethical use of GenAI in assessment. This poster addresses the principles adopted by School of Sport and Physical Activity for the transparent use of GenAI and the efficacy of the AI Usage Declaration form.
References
Purvis, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Transparency Scale (AITS). National Teaching Repository. https://doi.org/10.25416/NTR.28806449
Bristol Institute for Learning and Teaching. (2024). Using AI in assessment. University of Bristol. https://www.bristol.ac.uk/bilt/sharing-practice/guides/guidance-on-ai/using-ai-in-assessment/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 David Claxton

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons-Attribution (CC-BY) licence.This licence allows people to ‘copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format' and 'remix, transform, and build upon the materiafor any purpose, even commercially.'
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.